![]() (The format depends on how the app from which you’re “printing” provides the data.) Specifically, the file is saved to the Printopia folder inside your Documents folder it is also automatically opened in Preview for viewing. If you haveĭropbox installed, Send To Dropbox On Mac performs a similar task, but instead saves the resulting file to a Printopia folder inside your Dropbox folder, where it is then synced to all your other Dropbox-enabled devices. These two features mean you don’t actually need to print to find Printopia useful. In fact, I find the Send To Mac and Send To Dropbox features alone to be worth the price of admission. For example, I often take iPhone and iPad screenshots for my writing, and the Send To Dropbox feature is the easiest-and fastest-way I’ve found to get those screenshots onto all my Macs for immediate use. And I’ve been using the Save To Mac option to save electronic copies of receipts from Safari on my iPad. My only complaint is that I wish I could choose where Printopia saves these files. Keep in mind, however, that AirPrint works much like Mac OS X’s print-to-PDF feature-it creates a copy of any document you “print.” This means any photos you send to your Mac using Printopia will be saved as new image files that don’t include the original photo’s metadata.) (You can also use Printopia with the iOS Photos app to quickly transfer one or more photos to your Mac. Printopia’s other big draw is that, unlike AirPrint alone, which requires Mac OS X 10.6.5, Printopia works with any Mac running OS X 10.5 or later. Arturia's 2600V at its maximum 1156-pixel height, with the 1601 sequencer emulation and keyboard visible.Ĭompleting the quartet of vintage synth emulations they began with Moog Modular V, Arturia's latest plug-in aims to reproduce the sound of the greatest semi-modular of them all, ARP's 2600.Yes, Leopard users, you can use AirPrint, too. We see how it fares up against the original. Sure, you could compare the Minimoog and the Odyssey, but where were the equivalents to the wonderful Pro Soloist, the Axxe, and the Omni? The Satellite, the Micromoog and the Opus 3.? Give me a break.īut apart from this and the original Taurus pedals, Moog's record was never better than patchy. With no Moog equivalent, this combined pre-patched synthesis with the flexibility of a modular synth, all housed in a neat suitcase that didn't need a pair of roadies and a transit van to move it from one gig to the next. ![]() Nevertheless, the bias toward Moog survives to this day, as demonstrated by the host of digital imitations of the Minimoog. This month, we'll look at the first of these.īut perhaps this is about to change, with the almost simultaneous release of two ARP 2600 software synths. It's the fourth software-based emulated synth to emerge from Arturia, and as with their previous emulations, it aims to produce a sound as close as possible to that of the hardware instrument, whilst also sympathetically extending the original's feature-set with more modern facilities such as polyphony and MIDI capabilities. It's called 2600V, and as I've done with my previous reviews of Arturia's software emulations, I put it up against the original hardware synth to see just how close the emulation was. I began by evaluating the primary modules in the signal path: the VCOs, VCF, VCA, the output section, and the envelope generators that control them. ![]() The first two graphs below show the sawtooth waveform generated by VCO2 on my grey-face ARP 2600, and on 2600V. The equivalence is clear, and, as one would hope, the sound from these is all but indistinguishable. The authenticity started to wobble when I inspected the sine waves (see the last two graphs on this page). When directed straight to its output, 2600V 's sine is brighter than that of my ARP 2600 - and how can one sine wave be brighter than another? Patching the output to an oscilloscope revealed all - the sine wave on 2600V is not a sine wave at all. It contains significant overtones, although strangely, directing this wave through the pre-patched signal path eliminates the overtones, leaving the correct, pure tone (see the first two graphs on the next page). In listening tests, 2600V 's sound is a little brighter and less 'bottomy' than the ARP's, although the difference is subtle.Īs you can see from the last two graphs on the next page, 2600V generates a 'shark's tooth' waveform, while my ARP produces something thoroughly triangle-like. However, I've seen the waveform before it's very similar to the triangle wave produced by Arturia's Minimoog V (printed in my March 2005 review of that product), and even though it's not identical to 2600V 's, I couldn't help but wonder if Arturia were recycling some of their technology, even though 2600V supposedly models a different synth.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |